Reach beyond the community

Recruit beyond the obvious audience.

Relevane supplements its professional community with targeted recruitment designed around the specific audience, market, and method required by each study.

What it is

A recruiting community is a starting point, not a boundary.

Custom B2B recruitment identifies likely professionals outside an enrolled research community, invites them transparently, obtains consent, and applies the same study-specific qualification process used for community members.

Sourcing map

Two starting paths. One transparent qualification route.

Source changes the beginning of the search. It should not change invitation clarity, consent, or the study-specific evidence required for selection.

Community-plus-custom sourcing map

Professional community

Start with people who have chosen to maintain a research profile.

  1. 01

    Review profile context

    Look for role, responsibility, environment, recency, and geography signals relevant to the brief.

  2. 02

    Build a possible outreach set

    Keep profile relevance separate from study qualification and confirmed participation.

Targeted outreach

Extend the search when the audience is unlikely to be fully represented in the community.

  1. 01

    Map likely professional contexts

    Translate criteria into roles, organizations, operating environments, and appropriate channels.

  2. 02

    Identify possible professionals

    Use privacy-conscious business context and keep a direct decline path available.

Both paths continue through

  1. 01
    Transparent invitation

    Explain the sender, research purpose, reason for contact, expected next step, and direct decline path.

  2. 02
    Consent to continue

    Move interested professionals into the stated screening and privacy process without implying selection.

  3. 03
    Common qualification

    Apply the same study-specific criteria, evidence language, and disclosure of limits regardless of source.

Community sourcing and targeted outreach should converge on the same clear invitation, consent, and study-specific qualification path.

Transparency ledger

Keep source, invitation, consent, and qualification distinct.

A clear project plan should answer who was contacted, how consent was established, what qualification evidence applies, and when each handoff occurs.

Sourcing transparency questions

Source
What should be clearWhether the person came from the professional community or targeted outreach.
WhenVisible in the recruiting plan and candidate context.
Invitation
What should be clearWho is contacting them, why the study may be relevant, and what the next step involves.
WhenBefore any screening begins.
Consent
What should be clearThe professional chooses whether to continue into the stated screening and privacy process.
WhenRecorded according to the approved project workflow.
Qualification
What should be clearThe same study-specific criteria and evidence language apply regardless of source.
WhenPresented with meaningful limits and selection status.

Before outreach

Make feasibility and privacy constraints visible.

  • Audience definitionRole labels alone rarely expose the responsibilities, environment, recency, and decision context the study needs.
  • Channel fitAppropriate business context, timing, geography, and a direct decline path shape how a search can proceed.
  • Selection languageAn invitation to screen is not a promise of participation, and qualification is not a universal verification claim.

Custom recruitment

Map the audience before choosing the sourcing paths.

Share the responsibilities, operating context, geography, recency, method, timing, and hard constraints. We will use the complete target to frame a community-plus-outreach approach for review.